At some points during the article I had a hard time following Biss's thoughts because they did not seem to connect in my mind. The allusion to Dante's Inferno on page 172 especially threw me off because I was not really sure how it related to the article. To me, the allusion seemed akward. But after some careful consideration and some background research on Dante's Inferno I managed to visualize its relevance to "The Pain Scale". While Dante describes Hell as being vile in his poem, once again as a reader you have to remember this is only from his point of view. Biss realizes this and says that "[i]n the second circle of Dante's Inferno, the adulterous lovers cling to each other.......[m]y next door neighbor, who loves Chagall, does not think this sounds like Hell" (Biss, 174). This brings up the point that pain is measured differently by every person, while some people are completely terrified by the idea of Hell, others are perfectly content with it. On the very last page of Biss's essay, Inferno is mentioned again by saying that Dante describes Hell by saying that it does not have a tenth circle. How can the most painful place in the universe not have a tenth circle, the number which supposedly represents the most pain imaginable?
Works Citied
Biss, Eula. "The Pain Scale". Ways of Reading An Anthology for Writers. Ed. John E. Sullivan III. Boston, New York: Bedford/ St. Martin, 2011. 171-182. Print
No comments:
Post a Comment